Original source: Department for Education — Cross-cutting themes in identifying, supporting and collaborating for children and young people with SEND: a rapid evidence review (ref RR1546, September 2025). Research evidence, not statutory guidance.
Over 1.7 million pupils in England are identified as having special educational needs, and the figure has risen steadily since 2016. Autism is the most common need among pupils with an EHC plan; speech, language and communication needs the most common among those on SEN support. This DfE-commissioned rapid evidence review, led by UCL, is the synthesis document of the series: it draws together the strategies that work across different needs, rather than within a single category. For a busy school leader, it is the one to read first.
What repeats across every category
Several findings recur across the whole series. Early identification matters. Assessment should be holistic and sensitive to context. The teacher’s expertise is central. Motivation and self-regulation are levers, not nice-to-haves. And supportive relationships are the substrate everything else grows in. A handful of approaches — peer-mediated learning, literacy support, and universal design for learning — emerged as beneficial across very different learner profiles, which makes them the best first investment for a school with limited resource.
On identification, the review is consistent with its siblings: formal diagnosis belongs to specialists, but teachers drive early recognition through structured observation, accessible screening tools, and collaboration with the SENCo, parents and external professionals. Multiple sources and multiple informants — teachers, caregivers, the pupil — build a holistic profile. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is useful for profiling emotional and behavioural concerns, but the self-report version can disadvantage pupils with language or communication difficulties, so tools must be matched to a child’s language ability.
Support: reduce load, protect motivation, build vocabulary
Effective support begins with high-quality universal teaching, so fewer children need individual intervention at all. The strategies that help target underlying cognitive and behavioural difficulties — working memory, attention, self-regulation. Explicit instruction, scaffolding, task sequencing and visual supports reduce cognitive load. Predictable routines, clear expectations and accessible materials reduce processing demands and anxiety.
Motivation is not a soft add-on: interventions that built in praise, goal-setting and autonomy showed better academic outcomes. Peer-mediated instruction — Class-Wide Peer Tutoring, Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies, structured reciprocal pairs — benefited pupils with diverse needs including SEMH and autism. Self-Regulated Strategy Development works as either universal provision or a targeted intervention, and vocabulary support, using written word forms and motivational supports, reliably boosts literacy.
Collaboration is where schools win or lose
The review is unusually rich on collaboration. Effective partnership fosters knowledge exchange and shared decision-making, which produces person-centred provision. But it also names the failure modes: unclear role definitions, differing professional priorities, and communication barriers, especially for families navigating the system. Three models recur — multi-level service delivery such as Response to Intervention, social-capital approaches that build trust and parental advocacy, and knowledge-exchange partnerships between education and health. What makes them work is training with multiple components: modelling, feedback and coaching align agendas and improve fidelity and confidence.
Family-school partnership turns on trust, shared goals and flexibility. Parents advocate better when they are informed and included, but schools must understand the barriers families face — including poor understanding of the system and cultural or logistical challenges. Structured consultation, remote tools and jargon-free communication bridge the gap.
The bottom line: identification, support and collaboration work best embedded in a whole-school approach led from the top. For leaders, that means building universal provision into daily routines, investing in teacher development, and treating parents and specialists as equal partners rather than peripheral figures.
Practical takeaways for schools
- Read this synthesis first: it flags the strategies that transfer across needs — peer-mediated learning, literacy support and universal design for learning.
- Match assessment tools to a child’s language ability; self-report tools can disadvantage pupils with communication needs.
- Embed universal provision in daily routines under senior-leadership ownership, not as an add-on.
- Build family partnership on trust, shared goals and flexible, jargon-free communication.
More from the DfE SEND evidence series
This is part of a series summarising the DfE’s rapid evidence reviews on identifying and supporting SEND in mainstream settings:
-
– Identifying and supporting SEMH needs in schools
– Identifying and supporting cognition and learning needs
– Identifying and supporting speech, language and communication needs
– Identifying and supporting sensory and physical needs
– Behavioural and social communication interventions for SEMH and autism
– Supporting stammering, speech and language in the early years
– Identifying and supporting autistic children and young people
To talk to an adviser about our training, contact us.