Is Whole-School Positive Handling the right answer?
The post weighs training every member of staff, with certificates for inspection, cover everywhere and one consistent message, against the cost and impact, and says it suits schools whose risk assessment demands it.
Restraint in school – what the law says
A pointer to a Schools Week article by solicitor Jade Kent on the use of force, plus Mark Dawes’ advice on agreed policy, suitable training, behaviour plans and recording everything.
Positive Handling By The Numbers #6: Duty of Care
Duty of care is set out as the concept behind any decision to step in and create safety. Cases include a learning assistant badly hurt lifting a fallen Christmas tree off children.
Positive Handling by the Numbers #4 – Be Cautious around 4-year Olds!
Four reasons to be cautious with young children, including the strain of working at low level and the way early years children can pass the point where de-escalation still works.
Positive Handling by the Numbers #3: Section 3 Risk Assessments
Section 3 of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 requires employers to assess risk to employees. Three approaches follow, covering the role, foreseeable events and dynamic decisions made mid-incident.
Positive Handling by the Numbers #2: The Number is Always Two!
Two staff are the minimum for any physical intervention. One colleague witnesses and corroborates what happened, and the tactical arithmetic is against a lone adult facing a child in crisis acting primally.
Positive Handling by the Numbers #1 Working Solo
One person positive handling is described as inherently dangerous and not recommended. A rural school case shows staff working alone with phones that had no signal, so lone worker provisions need careful thought.